Sawtooth Software: The Survey Software of Choice

Within- and Across-Attribute Constraints in ACA and Full Profile Conjoint Analysis (1992)

This paper has been archived and removed from our list of current Technical Papers. The information it provides may be outdated or irrelevant based on our present understanding of the topic. However, we will continue to publish it here for historical purposes.

Many studies have indicated that the predictive validity of partworth estimates in conjoint analysis can be improved by imposing constraints on utility estimates. In this paper, two types of constraints are investigated: within- and across-attribute. Prior information can be imposed (i.e. a priori order for quantitative variables such as Price) or collected during the interview (i.e. self-explicated rankings and importance ratings). The authors (van der Lans, Wittink, Huber and Vriens) investigate the effect of imposing constraints on conjoint utilities for full-profile and ACA. Hit rates for hold-out concepts are shown to increase significantly for full-profile when utility constraints are imposed. ACA hit rates on average are higher than full-profile, and are not significantly improved by imposing constraints. Originally published in 1992 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings.

  Download PDF   View in new window

Lighthouse Studio

Lighthouse Studio is our flagship software for producing and analyzing online and offline surveys. It contains modules for general interviewing, choice-based conjoint, adaptive choice-based conjoint, adaptive choice analysis, choice-value analysis, and maxdiff exercises.

Try Lighthouse Studio

  Buy Lighthouse Studio

Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis

New to conjoint analysis? Pick up a copy of Bryan Orme's best-selling book today!

Learn More