# Comparing HB maxdiff results: same tasks & model, different samples

I have a question about comparing importance scores from HB analysis of 2 separate samples (A, B) completing same tasks, but models estimated separately.

Take the example of mean scores for items X & Z, with the HB scores scaled to sum to 100 in both cases:

•    For group A, the mean importance scores are X and Z
•    For group B, the mean importance scores are X and Z

My understanding is that I can argue that
1.    for A: X is 4 times more important than Z
2.    for B: X is 2 times more important than Z

What about comparisons between groups A and B?
Can I infer that:
3.    Z is more important for B than for A?
4.    Z is twice as important for B than for A?

Although in both samples/models the scores are scaled to sum to 100, the scale factor could be different in the 2 samples which suggests I can’t make comparisons 3 or 4 - I can compare ratios between models, but not absolute values. Or is that overly cautious?

Can anyone advise on (in)appropriate inference?

thanks
Dan
answered Aug 29, 2013 by Platinum (85,300 points)