I am carrying a ACBC analysis using Sawtooth.
I would like to clarify whether my understanding is correct about Must to Have and Unacceptable.
As far as I understand, not all respondents will have to inform on this, as these questions 'pop up' in case Sawtooth detects some consistent pattern in the responses and probe the informants to confirm whether the levels detected are truly Must to have or Unacceptable from the perspective of the respondent.
Is my understanding correct ?
Does this explain why the base sample does not have necessarily the size of the sample of respondents ?
Is there any best practice to analyze and report Must to Have and Unacceptable ?
many thanks in advance for your feedbacks,